🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.